The Need to Address Alternative and New Religious Movements

Throughout my previous article, "The Nature of Faith" I dealt with the fact that the travesty of faith is God-centered faith in contradiction to the worldview understanding of the Faith movement's anthropological view of atheistic evolutionism: that the theistic God of the Bible is a "Faith" being that is subject to such spiritual laws. That the "impersonal" god of the Faith movement have to "utilize" the "force of faith" through faith-filled words to create the world of its own imagination (Rom. 1:21-23). Thus the whole of the Faith movement understanding of "Faith" is rank atheistic; not what is monotheistic (1 Cor. 8:6).  Not only is the God of the Bible humanistic, but the doctrine of Faith is an "carcinogenic" faith that of such "electrical, tangible "force" that the "Faith" Christian utilize through visualization and "word" power to create the world of their own desires.

The centrality of faith is centered upon the theistic God of the Bible! The theism of God is based upon Who He is based upon His divine character: that of His trustworthiness. There are many professing Christians who have problem trusting God for who He is and his promises. The nature of faith is centered upon God thus to replace faith in God for something else (e.g. "faith in faith") is to dishonor the Creator by which it is a false faith. According to Word-Faith theology is that, "Faith is a force; words are the container of the force by which the "Faith" believer can create their own world." The "impersonal" God of the of the Faith movement is some "cosmic" gofer at the beck and call of the Faith believer's selfish desires. As the "Faith" Christian utilize his or her "force" of faith through words can manipulate the spirit world to bring about such tangible results whether it be a house, car, money, or succe